Judge Alvin Hellerstein has ruled that Larry Silverstein cannot keep double-dipping for billions of extra dollars in World Trade Center insurance money.
Silverstein, who bought the condemned-for-asbestos World Trade Center
two months before it was struck by “Zionist lightning”* in 2001, was
asking for an extra 11 billion dollars, on top of the roughly five
billion dollars he has already extorted from insurers, despite his public confession to demolishing WTC-7 himself.
Judge Hellerstein, who had already reduced the 11 billion dollar second
claim to three billion dollars, finally got fed up with Silverstein’s
outlandish chutzpah and dismissed the case.
Publicly, Hellerstein hailed Silverstein as one of the “heroes” of
9/11 who “sought to create beauty out of destruction” (“beauty”
apparently meaning “an endless US war on Israel’s enemies”). Yet the
judge declined to hand Silverstein the extra three billion dollars.
Hellerstein’s private memo to Silverstein – which has just been made
public by Edward Snowden, who is still using his NSA backdoor algorithms
to hack into everyone on earth’s private correspondence – reveals an
interesting back-story.
From: Judge Alvin “Big Al” Hellerstein
To: Lucky Larry
Dated: Wednesday, July 17th, 2013
CC: Edward Snowden, Moscow Airport, Delayed Departures Lounge
Hey “Lucky Larry”
Your luck has run out, pal.
You are making the tribe look bad.
You bought a condemned property. You doubled the insurance. It burned
down. Then you doubled down again with your double-indemnity claim. And
now here you are, doubling down a third time.
Third time’s the charm, schmuck.
You can take those three billion shekels you’re asking for and stick them right up your keister.
The whole world knows you as “Mr. Pull-It.”
You are a world-class putz.
Mr. Rothschild is getting very, very angry with you.
You have enormous chutzpah, Mr. Silverstein. And I do not mean that in the goyish complimentary sense.
If I were you, I would stay out of tall buildings until this thing blows over.
Sincerely,
Judge Alvin Hellerstein
Mossad Special Operations – American Judiciary Infiltration Unit
32°8’35″N 34°48’15″E
Tel Aviv, Israel
*When a building burns down in New York, for no discernible reason
other than insurance fraud, it’s attributed to “Jewish lightning.” Yes,
we know that’s an anti-Semitic expression. The people of New York
should be ashamed of themselves for talking that way.
A major transition in US counter-terrorism doctrine is unfolding.
While Barack Obama, following in the footsteps of George W. Bush,
remains firmly committed to waging a “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT),
his administration is now openly supporting selected rebel units in Syria which are part of the Al Qaeda network.
Known and documented, Al Qaeda is a creation of the CIA, which has
covertly supported the “Islamic Terror Network” since the heyday of the
Soviet Afghan war.
While Al Qaeda is a US sponsored “intelligence asset”, a “New Normal” has been established.
An Al Qaeda affiliated organization, namely Syria’s Al
Nusrah, is being supported “overtly” by the US President, rather than
“covertly” by the CIA.
The support of Al Nusrah, an affiliate of al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), is
no longer channeled in secrecy as part of a CIA-MI6 covert operation,
it is now being supported –in a semi-official fashion– as part of a US
foreign policy agenda. The latter is also part of America’s diplomatic
discourse, implemented in consultation with Britain, Canada, Germany and
France. Although Al Nusrah was not mentioned explicitly, “support to
the Syrian rebels” was the main topic of debate at the June 2013 G-8
meetings in Northern Ireland.
While intelligence covert ops continue to perform an important role,
Washington’s support to Al Qaeda in Syria is now “out in the open”,
within the public domain. It is no longer part of a secret undertaking.
It is part of the mainstay of US foreign policy, carried out under the
helm of Secretary of State John Kerry.
“Support to the rebels” is also debated in the US Congress. It is the
object of a bill which has already been adopted by the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee. Senator Corker who co-sponsored the bill stated
that:
“The future for Syria is uncertain, but the U.S. has a vested interest in trying to prevent an extremist takeover, which poses a very real risk for us and the region,” (emphasis added)
In a twisted logic, the bill purports to prevent “an extremist takeover” by supporting an Al Qaeda terrorist formation.
The Senate Committee on Foreign Relations voted 15-3 in favor of the proposed bill.
Ironically, the pro-Israeli lobby was also actively involved in lobbying in favor of aid to jihadist rebels.
Israel has supported Al Nusrah militarily in areas adjacent to the occupied territories of the Golan Heights.
Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky (left) voted against the bill, warning: “You will be funding today the allies of al Qaeda” (quoted by RT) Al Qaeda, Osama and “The Blowback”
Everybody knows that Al Qaeda is now directly supported by the US government.
The implications are far-reaching. Obama’s decision not only
undermines the legitimacy of the “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT), it
also casts doubt on the “blowback” thesis.
Moreover, it begs the embarrassing question: Why is the US president supporting Al Nusrah, which is on the US State Department list of terrorist organizations?
The CIA refers to the so-called “blowback” thesis whereby an
“intelligence asset”, (i.e. the Islamic jihad) is said to “have gone
against its sponsors”; ”
The sophisticated methods taught to the Mujahideen, and
the thousands of tons of arms supplied to them by the US – and Britain –
are now tormenting the West in the phenomenon known as `blowback’,
whereby a policy strategy rebounds on its own devisers. (The Guardian,
London, September 15, 2001).
“What we’ve created blows back in our face.” The US government and
the CIA are portrayed as the ill-fated victims. The CIA had been tricked
by a deceitful Osama. It’s like “a son going against his father”.
While the CIA acknowledges that the late Osama bin Laden, leader of
Al Qaeda, was an “intelligence asset” during the Cold War, the
relationship is said to “go way back”. In the wake of 9/11, news reports
would invariably dismiss these Osama-CIA links as part of the “bygone
era” of the Soviet-Afghan war. They are invariably described as
“irrelevant” to an understanding of the post-9/11 era:
“Bin Laden recruited 4,000 volunteers from his own
country and developed close relations with the most radical mujahideen
leaders. He also worked closely with the CIA, … Since September 11,
[2001] CIA officials have been claiming they had no direct link to bin
Laden.” (Phil Gasper, International Socialist Review, November-December
2001)
Afghan Mujahideen Commanders meet with President Ronald Reagan
While the “blowback” thesis is an obvious fabrication, it has
nonetheless served to provide legitimacy to the “Global War on
Terrorism”. With “overt” support channeled by the US government to an Al
Qaeda affiliated organization, the blowback thesis falls flat, it is no
longer credible.
The evidence amply confirms that the CIA never severed its ties to
the “Islamic Militant Network”. Historically, US covert support to
terrorists was a safely guarded secret, unknown to the broader public.
Moreover, the CIA would never channel its support directly. It would
proceed through its intelligence counterparts in Pakistan and Saudi
Arabia.
Since the end of the Cold War, these covert intelligence links have
not only been maintained, they have become increasingly sophisticated.
The broad political and media consensus in the wake of the 9/11
attacks was built around the blowback: Al Qaeda had attacked America.
The Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) against Al Qaeda and its
affiliates had been launched. Yet the evidence amply confirms that US
intelligence continues to harbor several terrorist organizations which
are on the US State Department’s list.
Paradoxically, covert support to the terrorists by Western
intelligence agencies (including the CIA, MI6, Germany’s BND) is an
essential instrument of the “Global War on Terrorism”. Namely the war on
terror to protect the Homeland is waged by using US-NATO sponsored
terrorists and mercenaries as foot-soldiers of the Western military
alliance.
The support provided covertly to “jihadist” terrorist organizations
in a large number of countries (e.g. former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan,
Iraq, Somalia, Yemen, Libya, Syria, Niger, Mali, Algeria, Egypt, etc.)
has been used by the US-NATO alliance to destabilize sovereign states. Obama and Al Nusrah. The “State Sponsors of Terrorism”
Al Qaeda was identified as the mastermind of the 911 attacks on the World Trade Center Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11 was immediately identified as a
“state sponsor of terrorism” leading to the bombing and invasion of
Afghanistan by US and NATO forces on October 7, 2001. In turn, a gamut
of counterterrorism legislation and executive orders were put in place
in the immediate wake of the 9/11 attacks. Executive Order 13224, signed by President George W. Bush on September 23, 2001 “authorizes
the seizure of assets of organizations or individuals designated by the
Secretary of the Treasury to assist, sponsor, or provide material or
financial support or who are otherwise associated with terrorists.”
(Sept. 23, 2001).
The US Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act 2001, signed into law by
President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The legislation was in
response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade
Centre and the Pentagon, which allegedly had been perpetrated by Al
Qaeda.
According to the 2001 Patriot Act, those “who pay for the bomb“, namely those who fund affiliates of Al Qaeda, are terrorists. In the words of George W. Bush on September 11, 2001, “We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.”
The Act pertains to the harboring and financing of terrorist
organizations. Al Qaeda and its affiliates are defined in the PATRIOT
Act as a terror network. Persons and organizations which support or abet
Al Qaeda are considered as terrorists.
The forbidden question: Does the substance of Executive order 13224
and the PATRIOT legislation quoted above apply to a US president, a
Secretary of State, a Member of the US Congress?
The Department of Justice “has prosecuted individuals and
organizations for providing material support to the terrorist
organization, while the Department of Treasury has frozen the assets of
dozens of terrorist financiers and networks.” (See Council on Foreign Relations)
Similar measures, including the freezing of assets or organizations
supportive of terrorism, were adopted in the European Union. “Since
2007, Britain’s Ministry of Finance has frozen the assets (PDF) of hundreds of individuals and organizations connected to al-Qaeda via its Asset Freezing Unit.” (Ibid)
National governments which provide support to Al Qaeda are categorised as “State-sponsors of terrorism”.
The designation is determined by the US State Department. In fact,
the Secretary of State, namely John Kerry has the authority “to
determine that the government of such country has repeatedly provided
support for acts of international terrorism.” (State Department List), See also theCounterterrorism Bureau) Barack Obama and John Kerry: Are They “Terror Suspects”?
Now let us examine in more detail the Al Nusrah Front, which
constitutes the main rebel fighting force in Syria. Al Nusrah is
affiliated to Al Qaeda. The leader of Al Nusra, Abu Mohammad al-Golani,
has pledged his allegiance to Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, who
replaced Osama bin Laden after his death.
According to the State Department Bureau of Counter-terrorism, Jabhat
al Nusrah, the main rebel force in Syria is a terrorist organization,
an affiliate of Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI).
The State Department has issued a “prohibition against
knowingly providing, or attempting or conspiring to provide, material
support or resources to, or engaging in transactions with, al-Nusrah
Front, and the freezing of all property and interests in
property of the organization that are in the United States, or come
within the United States or the control of U.S. persons.” (emphasis
added).
It is understood that US State Department Counter-terrorism policy also applies to “state sponsors of terrorism”.
Al Nusrah is financed by Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Israel in close consultation with NATO and the Pentagon.
The Obama administration has openly confirmed its support for the Syrian rebels with most of this aid channeled to Al Nusrah.
The PATRIOT Act “prohibits knowingly harboring persons who have
committed or are about to commit a variety of terrorist offenses”.
Moreover, an entire gamut of executive orders as well as the 2001 Patriot legislation prohibit “the harboring of terrorists”.
According to the US Justice Department:
The Patriot Act imposed tough new penalties on those who
commit and support terrorist operations, both at home and abroad.” The
terror threat emanates both from“the terrorist who pays for a bomb as by the one who pushes the button”.
According to the Patriot legislation, those “who pay for the bomb”,
namely funding affiliates of Al Qaeda, constitutes a terrorist act.
In other words, the Obama administration and its allies are harboring a terror organization which is on the US State department list.
In this regard, President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry could be held responsible for“knowingly
providing, or attempting or conspiring to provide, material support or
resources to, or engaging in transactions with, al-Nusrah Front”:
“The [PATRIOT] Act created a new offense that prohibits knowingly
harboring persons who have committed or are about to commit a variety of
terrorist offenses”, yet the Obama administration is openly supporting a
terrorist entity, in violation of its own counter-terrorism
legislation. Media Complicity
According to CNN, quoting intelligence sources, Al Nusrah is “the
best-equipped arm of the terror group” in Syria, with an estimated
10,000 forces. Where do they get their money and weapons? CNN does not
provide any details as to Why Al Nusrah is the best equipped, in
relation to the various so-called moderate rebels factions, which from a
military standpoint are broadly inoperative.
How many of these Al Nusrah forces remain operative following the government’s counteroffensive remains to be established.
Ironically, this latest CNN report (June 18, 2013 suggests that the
rebels rather than the government have chemical weapons in their
possession:
“They [Al Nusrah] are making desperate attempts to get
chemical weapons,” the analyst told CNN, noting that in the past few
weeks, security services in Iraq and Turkey arrested [Al Nusrah] operatives who were “trying to get their hands on sarin.”
In relation to the later, Turkish Police confirmed that the arrested Al Nusrah operative was in possession of sarin gas.
CNN contradicts its own reports. The same CNN article which intimated
that the rebels were “attempting to get” chemical weapons, makes the
case for “arming the rebels”:
The Obama administration announced last week that it will start arming rebelsbecause Syria crossed a “red line” by using chemical weapons — including sarin gas — against the opposition.
The development is likely to be at the center of the Group of Eight
summit in Northern Ireland on Monday, setting a riveting backdrop to the
meeting after Syria’s longtime ally Russia said the move supports
“those who kill their enemies and eat their organs.”
…Obama has not detailed the increased military support, but
Washington officials told CNN that the plan includes providing small
arms, ammunition and possibly anti-tank weapons to the rebels.
The Broader Implications of Obama’s Support of Al Nusrah
The blowback thesis is now defunct. The US has never ceased to
support Al Qaeda. These terrorist organizations were created by US
intelligence and supported by Washington. The blowback thesis is refuted
not only by Obama’s “overt support” of Al Nusrah but also with regard
to the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), an Al Qaeda affiliate,
which was directly supported by NATO from the outset of the insurgency
and Libya bombing campaign in 2011.
A d v e r t i s e m e n t
The
“Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT) has become an increasingly fragile
concept. Waging a “War on Terrorism” with the active participation of
an Al Qaeda affiliated organization constitutes an obvious fallacy, a
big lie, a non sequitur.
The propaganda and media disinformation campaign behind the “Global
War on Terrorism” has also entered a dead alley. Going after the
terrorists by supporting the terrorists? Will the American public
support a government which funnels billions of tax dollars to a
terrorist organization as a means to “combating terrorism”?
The Pentagon’s post-911 military doctrine is predicated on the
“Global War on Terrorism”. It is a consensus within US military. It is
used in the recruitment, training and indoctrination of US forces.
Will American servicemen and women accept to swallow the big lie and
fight in what visibly constitutes a fake “war on terrorism”. The Criminalisation of the US State
President Obama’s “overt” support to Syria’s Al Qaeda rebels “opens up a can of worms”.
How are we to categorize an American President who says he is
committed to fighting Al Qaeda, while at the same time supporting Al
Qaeda?
The entire Homeland Security doctrine tumbles like a deck of cards.
The US government is in blatant violation of its own counter-terrorism legislation.
If
there was any further proof needed that the Egyptian government has no
interest in protecting Coptic Christians from assault from Muslims, and
may be aiding and abetting such attacks, the evidence
is in. A just-released video appears to show Egyptian police standing
and watching while a murderous attack was launched April 7 on Coptic
Christians at a Cathedral, as they mourned other Coptic Christians who
were previously killed by Muslims. The first attack took place on April 4
in Khosous; four Copts were murdered and a nursery and church were
burned.
Not only did the Muslim police stand and watch; one police officer
apparently aided a Muslim gunman take aim at the mourners exiting the
church. Two Copts died, and 84 were injured, including 11 Coptic Police
officers. The video shows Muslims using guns, machetes, throwing stones,
and possibly hurling Molotov cocktails at the mourners exiting St.
Mark’s Coptic Orthodox Cathedral in the Abbassia District of Cairo.
And just guess who were the ones arrested? Four Copts. You read that correctly.
Andrew Johnston, advocacy director for Christian Solidarity Worldwide, said:
Two Copts were killed during the attack on the Cathedral; four more
died in Khosous, yet not one of their attackers has been arrested. These
arrests come at a time when the Coptic community in Egypt is still
coming to terms with an unprecedented attack on the headquarters of the
Coptic Orthodox Church and the violence in Khosous. Such discrepancies
in the discharge of justice contribute to impunity, and can only foster
more sectarianism.
The Egyptian National Council for Human Rights lamely protested:
There is a general feeling among citizens about the absence of law
and the prestige of the state. Such a feeling could push the citizens to
the violence and sectarianism without fearing from any deterrence … The
recent incident proved the shrinking of the role of the state to
control the actions of the individuals especially those people who think
that they talk on the behalf of God. There is a need for implementing
the law strictly to treat such incidents.
The Third Jihad: Radical Islam's Vision For America is a documentary film about the perceived threat of radical Islam in the United States.
The filmmakers contend that radical Islamists are engaging in a
"multifaceted strategy to overcome the western world," waging a
"cultural jihad" to "infiltrate and undermine our society from within"
The Third Jihad: Radical Islam's Vision For America is a controversial
documentary film made by Wayne Kopping on the subject of radical Islam
in present day United States.
The MD featured in the film conveys his own personality, what you see is
what you get. This film might be the most important for educating those who are unaware that there really are cultures that are not
compatible with Western democracy. The point of the film is that
Islam itself is not "truly" the way the jihadis portray it.
Whether he is correct or not about the history of Islam, the crucial
point is that we have consensus that Jihad is a problem. People like
Chomsky and Normand Finkelstein can flirt with murderers all they want
to, but the rest of the body politic needs to pay attention to the facts
before they cast their votes on the advise of such blind propagandists.
It's ironic that the 2 biggest problems in Western liberalism also
happen to be eligible for aliyah, and the biggest victim of their
misguided activism is Israel, with the United States suffering less only
due to her power and physical barrier from the heart of global
spheres of influence.
Raphael Shore, producer of Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the
West, and founder of the Clarion Fund is the producer of The Third
Jihad. The film was directed and edited by Wayne Kopping, who was also
the Director, Editor, and Co-Writer of Obsession.Co-Directing and
Co-Producing the film was Erik Werth, an Emmy-nominated television
producer at Dateline NBC and former advisor to senior government
officials.
The overriding theme of the film is the issue of homegrown jihad and its
threat to national security. 72 minutes long, the film explores the
alleged existence of an ongoing 'Cultural Jihad' in America.
Interviewees
Persons interviewed in the film include: former Secretary of Homeland
Security Tom Ridge, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, resident fellow
at the American Enterprise Institute Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Director of the
American Center for Democracy Rachel Ehrenfeld, founder and president of
the Alliance of Iranian Women Manda Zand Ervin, former Jammaa Islameia
terrorist Dr. Tawfik Hamid, British columnist and author Melanie
Phillips, Cleveland E. Dodge Professor Emeritus of Near Easter Studies
at Princeton University Bernard Lewis, former CIA operative Wayne
Simmons, Police Commissioner of New York City Raymond Kelly, founder of
the American Islamic Forum for Democracy (AIFD) Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser,
Senior Fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Walid
Phares, head of Masjid Al Islam mosque in Washington, DC Imam Abdul Alim
Musa, Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, former CIA Intelligence Expert
Clare Lopez, FBI Assistant Director for Public Affairs John Miller
(journalist) , President of the National Ten Point Leadership Foundation
Rev. Eugene Rivers, journalist and author Mark Steyn, and former CIA
Director during the Clinton Administration Jim Woolsey.
"The end goal of everything we are talking about is the
re-establishment of the Islamic form of government." Muslim Students
Association West event, Los Angeles, CA,
The Investigative Project on Terrorism has produced a new documentary titled "Jihad in America: the Grand Deception."
This is a documentary worth watching and promoting. Our popular press
and political culture have ignored this threat, and the Obama
administration is actively promoting Islam, both here and abroad. Muslim
activists have established positions of authority within the White
House, FBI, DHS, DoD, and elsewhere within our government. Even Grover
Norquist, director of Americans for Tax Reform, has discredited the
threat from Muslim extremists in our midst.
Many experts have echoed the danger articulated in The Grand Deception. The Center for Security Policy's Frank Gaffney has produced a free online video titled "The Muslim Brotherhood in America: A Course in 10 Parts."
Gaffney is a leading expert on national defense issues, and published
"Sharia: the Threat to America," along with former prosecutor Andrew
McCarthy and others, which details how the Brotherhood has planned to
subvert this country. I reported on this for Right Side News and
Cliff Kincaid held a National Press Club press conference on February 5th to detail how Al Gore's sale of Current TV
to Al Jazeera threatens to provide this anti-American, radical Islamist
television network a propaganda outlet within our borders. Cliff reports
that Al Jazeera appears to be breaking multiple laws in its effort to
expand its influence among American viewers, Obama's Justice Department
knows about it and is apparently doing nothing.
While the mainstream media and leftwing politicians dance on the
graves of 9-11 victims in their celebration of Islam, the Muslim
Brotherhood has made its intentions clear:
The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that
their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and
destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its
miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it
is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other
religions…
The accompanying chart reveals the Brotherhood's network of
associates and affiliates within the U.S. and throughout the world. This
should offer a snapshot of the problems this organization poses.
It is way past time to stop sacrificing our lives and country on the
alter of political correctness and diversity, and call the Muslim
Brotherhood, most other Muslim advocacy organizations and the
politicians of both parties who support them, the direct national
security threat they are.
Tick-Tock CAIR Clock*
132 Days, 18 Hours, 14 Minutes, 6 Seconds
- See more at: http://www.granddeception.com/#sthash.ezbpoqjo.dpuf
