Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts
Showing posts with label corruption. Show all posts

Saturday, October 26, 2013

World Bank Whistleblower Reveals Massive Corruption


 


                                                          

You need to know about this woman! Former Senior Counsel to the World Bank, Karen Hudes, unleashed recent interviews that should shatter any remaining fairytales about a functional and law-abiding system of banking and government. The good news is that she's part of a network of World Bank whistleblowers, working tirelessly to bring out the facts. And in her recent interviews, she names the names of people who are actively suppressing the facts, exposes the media for being one giant corporate shill, and reveals that all of the U.S. governors and attorneys general have been notified.
Matt Taibbi's recent "Everything Is Rigged" piece could not be more timely, and apparently it's right on target. But now we have it from people working in the highest echelons of the banking system. Check out Karen's numerous recent interviews. For example, this one on Coast to Coast (starting at 42:38) or the three-parter archived on her site, with Jim Fetzer from Veterans Today. Taibbi didn't tell you about World Bank board members being blackmailed, but Karen does! I don't want to spoil the "truth is stranger than fiction" experience for you. But these interviews are going to rock your world beyond Wikileaks and Bradley Manning.
And by the way, Karen trashes the SEC as being completely captured by the banksters, so there goes any hope of them approving meaningful crowdfunding activities, as per the JOBS Act.

Thursday, July 18, 2013

The Calls To Fire Eric Holder Should Worry Wall Street

fire eric holder
Isn’t it about time we saw a replacement for Eric Holder? Photo credit: ryanjelly
There’s recently been a sharp increase in the bipartisan calls to fire Eric Holder, an opinion we endorse. We want the Obama administration to fire Eric Holder and replace him with someone who will prosecute Wall Street. Here we’ll show a few excerpts from the recent calls to fire Eric Holder and explain our position. First, the excerpts:
From Jonathan Turley, Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University:
I am neither a Republican nor conservative, and I believe Holder should be fired.
From Michael Gerson, Washington Post opinion writer:
His tenure will not be remembered for its ideological bent. At times he has displayed the legal sensibilities of a flower child. At other points, he has provided the legal justification for President Obama’s expanded drone war or pursued the broadest attack on press freedom in decades.
From Matthew Filipowicz, host of the Matthew Filipowicz Show:
I’m sorry, but I do not buy that the Justice Department is powerless. They are not powerless here. Or if they are, it is 100% by choice. Eric Holder could prosecute Wall Street for their crimes, and the fact is he has chosen not to.
That last quote mirrors our opinion. If you’ve read the details of the specific crimes on Wall Street, or if you’ve seen Frontline’s documentary “The Untouchables,” you know that some Wall Streeters deserve jail time for the actions leading up to, during, and after the 2008 crash.
Frontline’s documentary was so powerful in proving the guilt on Wall Street and Washington’s lack of action that the day after it aired Lanny Breuer, the assistant attorney general, resigned. So there is clear proof that with enough public knowledge and enough public outcry over injustice, reform can happen.

What is perhaps most important, though, is that the public unites to demand that Holder’s replacement be someone who will hold Wall Street accountable.
As the links above show, we know that there are guilty players on Wall Street. We now just need someone with the political will to act on that knowledge. If Eric Holder is fired, it will at least give us that chance.
This isn’t a matter of satisfying some base desire for revenge. We don’t hold the view that all bankers are evil. We just know that if guilty Wall Streeters aren’t punished for their illicit activities in the financial crash, those activities are likely to continue over and over. It’s a matter of moral hazard, and it needs to be addressed quickly—before we find ourselves in another crisis.
It’s time to fire Eric Holder and replace him with someone who will hold Wall Street accountable (someone who didn’t work for Wall Street’s law firm, Covington & Burling).
***
If you haven’t followed the story on Holder and Wall Street, this clip below from Jon Stewart gives a quick overview.

Sen. Warren Asks AG Holder Why No Wall Street Prosecutions

 Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder inquiring as to why the Department of Justice failed to prosecute a single major Wall Street bank executive in the wake of the financial meltdown.


“Have you conducted any internal research or analysis on trade-offs to the public between settling an enforcement action without admission of guilt and going forward with litigation as necessary to obtain such admission and, if so, can you provide that analysis to my office?” wrote Warren.

The letter was also addressed to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Securities and Exchange Commission Chairwoman Mary Jo White.

In a May 2012 Daily Beast article, Government Accountability Institute President Peter Schweizer and veteran journalist Peter Boyer reported that Holder’s DOJ has failed to prosecute a single top Wall Street executive and that DOJ financial-fraud prosecutions are at 20-year lows.

Furthermore, Schweizer and Boyer revealed that Eric Holder’s former law firm, Covington & Burling, counts among its clients top financial firms and banks, including: Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Deutsche Bank.

Holder also installed other Covington & Burling lawyers in the Department of Justice, as well as others whose past firms represent the big banks:

Lanny Breuer, who had co-chaired the white-collar defense unit at Covington with Holder, was chosen to head the criminal division at Obama's Justice. Two other Covington lawyers followed Holder into top positions, and Holder's principal deputy, James Cole, was recruited from Bryan Cave LLP, another white-shoe firm with A-list finance clients.


With Holder now under intense fire for the Associated Press-DOJ snooping scandal, it remains to be seen whether Warren will get the answers she seeks about the DOJ’s refusal to prosecute Wall Street. Given Schweizer and Boyer’s revelations last year, perhaps Warren would do well to revisit the crony connections between Eric Holder, Lanny Breuer, Covington & Burling, and Wall Street.

Billionaires Dumping Stocks, Economist Knows Why? Again we are being had.. . . .

http://www.alt-market.com/images/stories/robber%20barons.jpgDespite the 6.5% stock market rally over the last three months, a handful of billionaires are quietly dumping their American stocks . . . and fast.

Warren Buffett, who has been a cheerleader for U.S. stocks for quite some time, is dumping shares at an alarming rate. He recently complained of “disappointing performance” in dyed-in-the-wool American companies like Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble, and Kraft Foods.

In the latest filing for Buffett’s holding company Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett has been drastically reducing his exposure to stocks that depend on consumer purchasing habits. Berkshire sold roughly 19 million shares of Johnson & Johnson, and reduced his overall stake in “consumer product stocks” by 21%. Berkshire Hathaway also sold its entire stake in California-based computer parts supplier Intel.

With 70% of the U.S. economy dependent on consumer spending, Buffett’s apparent lack of faith in these companies’ future prospects is worrisome.

Unfortunately Buffett isn’t alone.

Fellow billionaire John Paulson, who made a fortune betting on the subprime mortgage meltdown, is clearing out of U.S. stocks too. During the second quarter of the year, Paulson’s hedge fund, Paulson & Co., dumped 14 million shares of JPMorgan Chase. The fund also dumped its entire position in discount retailer Family Dollar and consumer-goods maker Sara Lee.

Finally, billionaire George Soros recently sold nearly all of his bank stocks, including shares of JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Goldman Sachs. Between the three banks, Soros sold more than a million shares.

So why are these billionaires dumping their shares of U.S. companies?

After all, the stock market is still in the midst of its historic rally. Real estate prices have finally leveled off, and for the first time in five years are actually rising in many locations. And the unemployment rate seems to have stabilized.

It’s very likely that these professional investors are aware of specific research that points toward a massive market correction, as much as 90%.

One such person publishing this research is Robert Wiedemer, an esteemed economist and author of the New York Times best-selling book Aftershock.

Editor’s Note: Wiedemer Gives Proof for His Dire Predictions in This Shocking Interview.

Before you dismiss the possibility of a 90% drop in the stock market as unrealistic, consider Wiedemer’s credentials.

In 2006, Wiedemer and a team of economists accurately predicted the collapse of the U.S. housing market, equity markets, and consumer spending that almost sank the United States. They published their research in the book America’s Bubble Economy.

The book quickly grabbed headlines for its accuracy in predicting what many thought would never happen, and quickly established Wiedemer as a trusted voice.

A columnist at Dow Jones said the book was “one of those rare finds that not only predicted the subprime credit meltdown well in advance, it offered Main Street investors a winning strategy that helped avoid the forty percent losses that followed . . .”

The chief investment strategist at Standard & Poor’s said that Wiedemer’s track record “demands our attention.”

And finally, the former CFO of Goldman Sachs said Wiedemer’s “prescience in (his) first book lends credence to the new warnings. This book deserves our attention.”

In the interview for his latest blockbuster Aftershock, Wiedemer says the 90% drop in the stock market is “a worst-case scenario,” and the host quickly challenged this claim.

Wiedemer calmly laid out a clear explanation of why a large drop of some sort is a virtual certainty.

It starts with the reckless strategy of the Federal Reserve to print a massive amount of money out of thin air in an attempt to stimulate the economy.

“These funds haven’t made it into the markets and the economy yet. But it is a mathematical certainty that once the dam breaks, and this money passes through the reserves and hits the markets, inflation will surge,” said Wiedemer.

“Once you hit 10% inflation, 10-year Treasury bonds lose about half their value. And by 20%, any value is all but gone. Interest rates will increase dramatically at this point, and that will cause real estate values to collapse. And the stock market will collapse as a consequence of these other problems.”

See the Proof: Get the Full Interview by Clicking Here Now.

And this is where Wiedemer explains why Buffett, Paulson, and Soros could be dumping U.S. stocks:

“Companies will be spending more money on borrowing costs than business expansion costs. That means lower profit margins, lower dividends, and less hiring. Plus, more layoffs.”

No investors, let alone billionaires, will want to own stocks with falling profit margins and shrinking dividends. So if that’s why Buffett, Paulson, and Soros are dumping stocks, they have decided to cash out early and leave Main Street investors holding the bag.

But Main Street investors don’t have to see their investment and retirement accounts decimated for the second time in five years.

Wiedemer’s video interview also contains a comprehensive blueprint for economic survival that’s really commanding global attention.

Now viewed over 40 million times, it was initially screened for a relatively small, private audience. But the overwhelming amount of feedback from viewers who felt the interview should be widely publicized came with consequences, as various online networks repeatedly shut it down and affiliates refused to house the content.

“People were sitting up and taking notice, and they begged us to make the interview public so they could easily share it,” said Newsmax Financial Publisher Aaron DeHoog.

“Our real concern,” DeHoog added, “is the effect even if only half of Wiedemer’s predictions come true.

“That’s a scary thought for sure. But we want the average American to be prepared, and that is why we will continue to push this video to as many outlets as we can. We want the word to spread.”

Editor’s Note: For a limited time, Newsmax is showing the Wiedemer interview and supplying viewers with copies of the new, updated Aftershock book including the final, unpublished chapter. Go here to view it now.



Group Wants Obama Impeached For His ‘Gay Lovers’

Group Wants Obama Impeached For His ‘Gay Lovers’ (Video)

by David Badash on July 15, 2013
Post image for Group Wants Obama Impeached For His ‘Gay Lovers’ (Video)
A grassroots group calling themselves Overpasses For Obama’s Impeachment cites the President’s supposed “gay lovers” as just one of 60 reasons they believe he should be impeached. Other ridiculous violations they claim include voter fraud, Sandy Hook, murders and drug use (that he supposedly has done?), FEMA camps, and “stole $billions.”
They’ve even put together this catchy 10-minute video with (I confess) a great song by Muse.
“Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment has a simple goal.. [sic] The removal of the corrupt and criminal President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama,” the group — which looks like a handful of folks who have lots of free time during the day — writes:
His actions go unimpeded, our pleas through petitions unanswered. Our calls and letters to Congress are left ignored and unopened.
Our only peaceful recourse is to take to the streets and overpasses of America and DEMAND that our nation be returned to We the People, and that Barack Hussein Obama be Impeached, removed from office, and held accountable for his actions while serving as President.
They conclude, “JOIN US and SAVE AMERICA!”
The group has a GoFundMe page, with a fundraising goal of $1 million. So far, they’ve raised $224.


 

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

"This Is A Sick Joke On ALL Of Us!" Obama Nominates Wall Street Protector To Head SEC


JIM ROGERS: I SUSPECT THEY'LL TAKE THE PENSION PLANS NEXT

Speaking towards the frightening implications of the Cyprus banking collapse, Jim said that, "It's been condoned [now] by the IMF, the European union, and everybody else in sight; that a government in need, can take assets. We all knew they could tax us...but this is the first time that I'm aware of, that they've gone in and taken bank accounts. They took gold from people in the U.S. in the 1930′s...but I've never heard of them taking bank accounts. [Now] they're doing it. So be careful [because], now they can take your bank account under this precedent."

When asked if bank account confiscation will be going worldwide, Jim said, "Well, it's now in their bag of tricks, but yes, they can do anything they want too now. I for one am worried and I'm taking preparations. Who knows if I'm right or not, but I'd rather be safe than sorry as all of those people who had money in Cyprus have learned. They thought they had a normal bank account...but now it's been [taken] with the sanctions of many governments and institutions."

Jim also urged that, "If people have money in any account, anywhere in the world...cut it down to under the guaranteed amount. They might take that too someday when things get desperate, because the precedent has been set, but that's where I would start if I had money in the bank anywhere in the world."

With respect to which assets governments will likely be coming for next, Jim said, "401k plans, IRA's, and pensions plans which the government knows about [may be next]...They're rationale would be, 'Well most people haven't been doing well in their IRAs and pension plans for the past several years, so we're going to help you. We're going to take your pension plan and give you government bonds so that you have a guaranteed return."

Jim further added that, "That's how they'll rationalize taking our money. They know where all the pension plans are because we have to report it, so they're easily accessible by governments. They know where they are, what they are, and they'll be able to snatch them away. Who knows what they'll do, but they'll certainly find some way to take our money when things get worse, they always have."

As a final chilling comment to end the interview, Jim noted that, "Anything they know about—they might easily take."

Obama: "Fundamentally Transforming the United States of America" Exactly What Does This plan Reveal!

Obama's Plan To Seize Control Of Our Economy And Our Lives
This 10-page document is a blueprint for a federal takeover of the economy that would dwarf the looming Obamacare takeover of the health insurance business. Specifically, Obama’s plan involves seizing control of:

* “All commodities and products that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals”

* “All forms of energy”

* “All forms of civil transportation”

* “All usable water from all sources”

* “Health resources – drugs, biological products, medical devices, materials, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment”

* Forced labor ( or “induction” as the executive order delicately refers to military conscription)

Moreover, federal officials would “issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources.”

Each government bureaucracy “shall act as necessary and appropriate.”

To be sure, much of this language has appeared in national security executive orders that previous presidents have issued periodically since the beginning of the Cold War.
[link to www.forbes.com]

Saturday, June 29, 2013

What If? America Woke Up And Understood ,Theyve Been Lied To?


EPIC BURN!! And Damn Right!! Bridenstine Questions President's Leadership

June 6, 2013
Speech
Floor Speech from June 4th 2013
“Mr. Speaker, the President’s Justice Department sold weapons to narco-terrorists south of our border who killed one of our finest.
The President’s State Department lied about Benghazi with false information provided by the White House.
The President’s Attorney General authorized spying on a Fox News journalist and his family for reporting on a North Korean nuclear test.
The President’s Justice Department confiscated phone records of the Associated Press because they reported on a thwarted terrorist attack.
The President’s Treasury Department uses the IRS to target political opposition.
The President’s Health and Human Services Secretary pressures the insurance companies, she is supposed to regulate, to promote ObamaCare, which is the same law she uses to force citizens to pay for abortion inducing drugs that are against their religious liberties.
Mr. Speaker, the President’s dishonesty, incompetence, vengefulness, and lack of moral compass lead many to suggest he is not fit to lead. The only problem is that his Vice President is equally unfit and even more embarrassing.”  
-Congressman Jim Bridenstine

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Executive Order H.R 645

H.R. 645
FEMA CAMPS
U.S Government bill authorizes $180,000,000 per year for fema facilities for containment purpose's due to a surge of illegal aliens and to serve as a mechanism of control for large numbers of political dissenters.
This is not to help people.  One only needs to take a look at what happened during Hurricane Katrina and it is obvious that the government does not care about the people.  They didn't care then, and they don't care now, and these facilities built or unbuilt will definitely not be utilized for the people's interest.

  WORK FOR THE TOTAL DEFEAT OF THIS HELLISH PROPOSED LAW H.R. 645 THAT WOULD ENABLE OUR GLOBAL ELITE LEADERS TO ENSLAVE, TORTURE, AND KILL US OFF.,,

 

1st Session
H. R. 645
To direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers on military installations.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 22, 2009
Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

ROGERS REPORT
*Congress Seeks To Authorize & Legalize FEMA Camp Facilities

Published on 01-26-2009


Source:
www.roguegovernment.com
By: Lee Rogers

A new bill has been introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives called the National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645

This bill if passed into law will direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers otherwise known as FEMA camp facilities on military installations. This is an incredibly disturbing piece of legislation considering that the powers that be have already set in motion an agenda to setup a nationwide marital law apparatus through U.S. Northern Command and the Department of Homeland Security. Apparently, the fusion centers, militarized police, surveillance cameras and a domestic military command is not enough. Even though we already know that detention facilities are already in place, they now want to legalize the construction of FEMA camps on military installations using the ever popular excuse that the facilities are for the purposes of a national emergency. With the phony debt based economy getting worse and worse by the day, the possibility of civil unrest is becoming a greater threat to the establishment. One need only look at Iceland, Greece and other nations for what might happen in the United States next. With this in mind, it appears as if these so called national emergency centers will be used in a national emergency but only if the national emergency requires large groups of people to be rounded up and detained. If that isn’t the case, than why have these national emergency facilities built in military installations?

Let’s look through the various portions of the bill. Here is section 2 of the bill taken directly from the proposed legislation.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.

(a) In General- In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.

(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure--

          (1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and
                families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;

          (2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination
                of Federal, State, and local first responders;

          (3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response,
                and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based
                organizations; and


          (4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.


The legislation says that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations. This means that the Secretary of Homeland Security can setup as many FEMA camps within military installations as they want, it just has to be more than 6 of them. On top of that, it also states that the facilities will be used to meet other appropriate needs as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security. This could mean anything. If the Secretary of Homeland Security thinks it is appropriate to kill large groups of people like the Nazis did in World War II Germany, than it looks as if this bill would give them the authority to use these facilities for that purpose.

Below is section 3 taken from the bill.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AS NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.


(a) In General- Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary
of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate not fewer than 6 military installations as sites for the establishment of national emergency centers.


(b) Minimum Requirements- A site designated as a national emergency center shall be--


          (1) capable of meeting for an extended period of time the housing, health, transportation,
                education, public works, humanitarian and other transition needs of a large number of
                individuals affected by an emergency or major disaster;


           (2) environmentally safe and shall not pose a health risk to individuals who may use the center;

           (3) capable of being scaled up or down to accommodate major disaster preparedness and
                 response drills, operations, and procedures;


           (4) capable of housing existing permanent structures necessary to meet training and first
                 responders coordination requirements during nondisaster periods;


            (5) capable of hosting the infrastructure necessary to rapidly adjust to temporary housing,
                  medical, and humanitarian assistance needs;


            (6) required to consist of a complete operations command center, including 2 state-of-the art
                  command and control centers that will comprise a 24/7 operations watch center as follows:

                  (A) one of the command and control centers shall be in full ready mode; and

                  (B) the other shall be used daily for training; and


            (7) easily accessible at all times and be able to facilitate handicapped and medical facilities,
                   including during an emergency or major disaster.


(c) Location of National Emergency Centers- There shall be established not fewer than one national emergency center in each of the following areas:


             (1) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions I, II, and III.


             (2) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IV.


             (3) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions V and VII.


             (4) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VI.


             (5) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Regions VIII and X.


             (6) The area consisting of Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX.


(d) Preference for Designation of Closed Military Installations- Wherever possible, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, shall designate a closed military installation as a site for a national emergency center. If the Secretaries of Homeland Security and Defense jointly determine that there is not a sufficient number of closed military installations that meet the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), the Secretaries shall jointly designate portions of existing military installations other than closed military installations as national emergency centers.


(e) Transfer of Control of Closed Military Installations- If a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer to the Secretary of Homeland Security administrative jurisdiction over such closed military installation.


(f) Cooperative Agreement for Joint Use of Existing Military Installations- If an existing military installation other than a closed military installation is designated as a national emergency center, not later than 180 days after the date of designation, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Defense shall enter into a cooperative agreement to provide for the establishment of the national emergency center.


(g) Reports-


            (1) PRELIMINARY REPORT- Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
                  the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall
                  submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site--


                  (A) an outline of the reasons why the site was selected;


                  (B) an outline of the need to construct, repair, or update any existing infrastructure at the
                         site;


                  (C) an outline of the need to conduct any necessary environmental clean-up at the site;

  
                  (D) an outline of preliminary plans for the transfer of control of the site from the Secretary
                         of Defense to the Secretary of Homeland Security, if necessary under subsection
                        (e); and


                   (E) an outline of preliminary plans for entering into a cooperative agreement for the
                         establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection
                         (f).


             (2) UPDATE REPORT- Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
                   the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall
                   submit to Congress a report that contains for each designated site--


                  (A) an update on the information contained in the report as required by paragraph (1);


                  (B) an outline of the progress made toward the transfer of control of the site, if necessary
                         under subsection (e);


                  (C) an outline of the progress made toward entering a cooperative agreement for the
                         establishment of a national emergency center at the site, if necessary under subsection
                         (f); and


                   (D) recommendations regarding any authorizations and appropriations that may be
                         necessary to provide for the establishment of a national emergency center at the site.


               (3) FINAL REPORT- Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the
                     Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit
                     to Congress a report that contains for each designated site--


                     (A) finalized information detailing the transfer of control of the site, if necessary under
                            subsection (e);


                     (B) the finalized cooperative agreement for the establishment of a national emergency
                           center at the site, if necessary under subsection (f); and


                     (C) any additional information pertinent to the establishment of a national emergency
                           center at the site.


              (4) ADDITIONAL REPORTS- The Secretary of Homeland Security, acting jointly with the
                    Secretary of Defense, may submit to Congress additional reports as necessary to provide
                     updates on steps being taken to meet the requirements of this Act.

 

SEC. 4. LIMITATIONS ON STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.
This Act does not affect--
(1) the authority of the Federal Government to provide emergency or major disaster assistance or to implement any disaster mitigation and response program, including any program authorized by the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.); or
(2) the authority of a State or local government to respond to an emergency.
SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
There is authorized to be appropriated $180,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010 to carry out this Act. Such funds shall remain available until expended.
SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act, the following definitions apply:
(1) CLOSED MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term ‘closed military installation’ means a military installation, or portion thereof, approved for closure or realignment under the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) that meet all, or 2 out of the 3 following requirements:
(A) Is located in close proximity to a transportation corridor.
(B) Is located in a State with a high level or threat of disaster related activities.
(C) Is located near a major metropolitan center.
(2) EMERGENCY- The term ‘emergency’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
(3) MAJOR DISASTER- The term ‘major disaster’ has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122).
(4) MILITARY INSTALLATION- The term ‘military installation’ has the meaning given such term in section 2910 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note).
This section authorizes the Homeland Security Secretary to setup these FEMA camps in closed or open military installations and in regions around the nation. This essentially legalizes any existing FEMA camp infrastructure that has been built in either closed or open military installations and opens the door for additional facilities to be created.

Fortunately, the bill only authorizes $180,000,000 per year for these facilities, but considering that the majority of the detention facilities are probably already built, they won't need much additional funding. There is no doubt judging from the language of this bill, that it is meant to legalize what they’ve already been doing. After all, FEMA has already been looking at ways to transport large quantities of people to camps, they held a FEMA camp drill which consisted of an illegal alien round up in Iowa and KBR/Halliburtion has already aided in the creation of detention facilities. The rationale behind this legislation is undoubtedly to serve as a mechanism of control if the authorities need facilities to hold large amounts of dissenting people.   This is not to help people.  One only needs to take a look at what happened during Hurricane Katrina and it is obvious that the government does not care about the people.  They didn't care then, and they don't care now, and these facilities built or unbuilt will definitely not be utilized for the people's interest.


Additional information on the FEMA camp situation can be viewed in previous articles written on this subject. Check them out below.


Secretive FEMA Camp Drill Running In Iowa

Rule By Fear Or Rule By Law
FEMA: Trains To Take You To The Camps
 

Monday, June 24, 2013

MEDIA BLACKOUT: Container Ship Carrying U.S. Weapons for Obama's Syrian Rebels Splits in Half/Sinks... Possible Russian Attack...

1 LESS WEAPON TO AL-QEADA

Unreal.‘A large fleet named “Mol Comfort” carrying Arms for FSA from the U.S. has crashed in the Indian Ocean as it made its way from Singapore to Jeddah, on board were 4,500 containers loaded with arms for the Syrian rebels’
‘MOL Comfort sank due to yet unclear reasons, sailing from Singapore to Jeddah and after that to North Europe, leaving behind hundreds of drifting containers and a huge aftershock hitting liner sector and all of the maritime industry.
Even the scale of the consequences is hard, impossible, to estimate, not to mention consequences themselves. This is the 1st case in liner sector, when modern ocean-going liner container vessel (built in Japan!) sank in the ocean after breaking in 2 parts, like a poorly built and managed bulk carrier or over aged coaster. Nothing like this ever occurred, and no one believed it was possible, even theoretically. It just could not happen, but still, here it is.’

'Snowden case shows US is bully boy of world'

Published on Jun 23, 2013
The plane carrying whistleblower Edward Snowden has landed at Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport. The former CIA contractor, who left Hong Kong in a bid to elude US extradition on espionage charges, is on his way to a 'third country' via Russia. Former MI5 agent Annie Machon says America's whistleblower hunt gives it the image of a major global aggressor - READ MORE http://on.rt.com/jqm8cb

RT LIVE http://rt.com/on-air

Subscribe to RT! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c...

Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTnews
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_com
Follow us on Google+ http://plus.google.com/+RT

RT (Russia Today) is a global news network broadcasting from Moscow and Washington studios. RT is the first news channel to break the 1 billion YouTube views benchmark.

Border Insecurity Citizens Track Surge Of Illegal Immigration!

In 1986 they promised that their pardon of 3.2 million illegals would be the "last amnesty." They promised border security and workplace enforcement and Fence's  to span Mexico's boarder into the U.S,Millions have been sent but nothing never happened.. The only debate they should be having is about implementing a nationwide and mandatory E-Verify program and putting law agencies to the task of workplace enforcement. No need to spend billions deporting 20+ million illegals. Simply dry up their sources of employment and they will go back home the same way they came.

British outrage over tax plan to take 7% of everyones saving's account

Thousands of British have reacted with outrage at the plans to tax bank accounts which are in credit. The great EU bank robbery, as it's been dubbed by some of the 60,000 or so ex pats living on the island has forced many to start plans to withdraw their savings as Susan Cairns who has lived and worked on the island since 2007 explained.

"On Tuesday I plan to go to the bank and withdraw all the money I have in there and have nothing left in there. You know, I can't trust them anymore. It's theft. They are stealing from me. That's how I see it," she said.

"I think it is particularly unfair for people that have saved and tried hard to keep some money in the bank, and it's just a blanket tax across everybody. I understand people with higher savings getting taxed more, but 6.75 percent seems an awful lot of money to me. I think it's a very clever way of making sure that Cyprus pays its fair share," opined another, Stuart Cowell.

British Chancellor George Osborne said his government will reimburse military and government personnel working on the island. But the UK tax payer will have to foot the bill.

Constantine Georgiou, a British Cypriot believes the Cypriot politicians should act. "The government should investigate thoroughly and find the people responsible for this mess, prosecute them, put them in prison, even if he is the ex-president, whoever is responsible," he said.

Thursday, June 20, 2013

Special Forces soldiers drop plan to ‘infiltrate’ Utah

Unconventional
Army Special Forces soldiers will not "infiltrate" Utah communities this summer — a plan that had riled residents suspicious of the government’s motives.
Green Berets had planned to parachute into several central Utah counties, cross mountains and work with Utahns who would be playing roles as resisters to an enemy regime.
The Defense Department wants the soldiers to have fresh training in skills at the heart of Special Forces’ mission, such as covertly cultivating relationships with regular citizens and training resistance forces trying to liberate themselves from oppressive governments, said Col. Robert Dunton, a special projects officer for the Utah National Guard who was helping organize the exercise.
Unconventional : The Defense Department had selected a central Utah community to participate in a training exercise for Army Special Forces soldiers

Setting
Setting: The town of Manti, Utah was deemed an ideal location because of the desert landscape and the strong religious conviction on its residents.

 The Special Operations Command has designated Utah, with its desert and mountain geography as well as a culture dominated by a religious faith, as a good place for such training.
"Every place we go [to train] is a different culture… a different mentality throws them off and requires [soldiers] to adapt," said Staff Sgt. Ryan Sabin, a spokesman for the 10th Special Forces.
But budget tightening and other factors have put the kibosh on the training.
Paul Weddle, a retired Green Beret contracted to help the Army set up the exercise in Sanpete, Sevier, Emery and Carbon counties, said he got news late Thursday it has been canceled.
The news was welcomed by some who had resisted the exercise.
"I’m relieved," said Alan Braithwaite of Manti. "I like to see them get trained; I just didn’t want them coming here and scaring people and that’s what it was doing."
Braithwaite was the leader of a sizable group that protested Manti’s welcoming of the Special Forces exercise last fall. Fifteen people spoke at a Manti City Council meeting the day after President Barack Obama was re-elected, urging the council to rescind the welcome.

Solyndra caught destroying it's own parts

FREMONT (CBS 5) — After filing for bankruptcy last year, Fremont solar company Solyndra still owes American taxpayers half a billion dollars. But CBS 5 caught them destroying millions of dollars worth of parts.

At Solyndra's sprawling complex in Fremont, workers in white jumpsuits were unwrapping brand new glass tubes used in solar panels last week. They are the latest, most cutting-edge solar technology, and they are being thrown into dumpsters.

Forklifts brought one pallet after another piled high with the carefully packaged glass. Slowly but surely it all ended up shattered.

And it's not a few loads. Hundreds of thousands of tubes on shrink-wrapped pallets will meet a similar demise.

Solyndra paid at least $2 million for the specialized glass. A CBS 5 crew found one piece lying in the parking lot. Solyndra still owes the German company that made the tubes close to another $8 million.

So why is a bankrupt company that owes a fortune to creditors, including American taxpayers, throwing away millions of dollars worth of assets?

Solyndra is not commenting. But court documents reveal the company received permission from the bankruptcy trustee to abandon the high grade glass, the court agreeing that it was of "inconsequential value" because the cost of storing them exceeds their value.

An employee for Heritage Global Partners, the company in charge of selling Solyndra's assets, told CBS 5 they conducted an exhaustive search for buyers but no one wanted them.

But how exhaustive was that search? The tubes were never included on the list of Solyndra assets put up for sale at two auctions last year.

If they were, David Lucky told CBS 5 he would have bought them. "We certainly would have bid on them, yes," Lucky said.

Lucky owns several large warehouses near Las Vegas. He buys and then resells manufacturing equipment and components all the time.

"Our company has bought a lot of stuff over the years. Truck loads and warehouses full of inventory that companies were just ready to send to the dump, because they don't want to take the time to find markets for it," he said.

When Solyndra shut down last year, he bought hundreds of fully assembled solar panels at the auctions and is reselling them on eBay. "They're going for a third their original price. They are a great deal," Lucky said.

He said if given a chance he would have snapped up the tubes too. "One day some manufacturing company would eventually need those," Lucky said.

Solar scientist Greg Smestad agreed they have value. "As a scientist I said 'Wow, this needs to be studied,'" he said. Smestad has consulted for the Department of Energy.

He recently bought a Solyndra solar panel to study its technology, which is completely different from traditional panels. "It can accept both the direct sun and also track motion, because it's a cylinder," he explained. "The technology is very promising."

Smestad wrote a letter to the auctioneers, asking if they could donate to Santa Clara University any of the leftover tubes after the Solyndra auctions are completed. "Let one student use this as an inspiration for their career and that will be worth something," he said. But the auctioneers wrote back saying they couldn't do that.

"That really makes me sad," said Smestad. "Those tubes represent intellectual investment. These could have had a better value to do public good. I think they owed the U.S. taxpayer that."

Solyndra was hoping to have sold the entire company by Thursday, but they called off the sale because nobody bid for it.

CBS 5 asked more than once for Solyndra, the auction company and the bankruptcy trustee to talk on camera. But they all refused.

CBS 5 also called the German company that made the glass tubes to see if they would have wanted the tubes back. After all, they are still owed almost $8 million dollars. A spokesman said he had no idea they were being destroyed.

Solyndra and Obama and friends got $535 Millon Dollars of your tax money!


President Obama visited the solar company Solyndra on May 26, 2010 to tout his $535 million loan guarantee. On August 31, 2011, Solyndra announced it was filing for bankruptcy and laying off 1,100 employees.

535 MILLION LOST! TAX PAYERS MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN! (ACUALLY IN THE POCKETS OF OBAMAS FUNDRAISER BUDDY)

The Obama administration restructured a half-billion dollar federal loan to a troubled solar energy company in such a way that private investors — including a fundraiser for President Barack Obama — moved ahead of taxpayers for repayment in case of a default, government records show.
Newly released emails show that the Obama administration was worried about the financial health of a troubled solar energy company even as officials publicly declared the company in good shape. An email from a White House budget official to a co-worker discussed the likely effect of a default by Solyndra Inc. on President Barack Obama's re-election campaign.
Under terms of the February loan restructuring, two private investors — Argonaut Ventures I LLC and Madrone Partners LP — stand to be repaid before the U.S. government if the solar company is liquidated. The two firms gave the company a total of $69 million in emergency loans. The loans are the only portion of their investments that have repayment priority above the U.S. government.

Argonaut is an investment vehicle of the George Kaiser Family Foundation of Tulsa, Okla. The foundation is headed by billionaire George Kaiser, a major Obama campaign contributor and a frequent visitor to the White House. Kaiser raised between $50,000 and $100,000 for Obama's 2008 campaign, federal election records show. Kaiser has made at least 16 visits to the president's aides since 2009, according to White House visitor logs.

Madrone Partners is affiliated with the Walton family, descendants of Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton.

HOW TO BANKRUPT THE WORLD !!! GOLDMAN SACHS MASTERS OF GREED

TODAY is my last day at Goldman Sachs. After almost 12 years at the firm — first as a summer intern while at Stanford, then in New York for 10 years, and now in London — I believe I have worked here long enough to understand the trajectory of its culture, its people and its identity. And I can honestly say that the environment now is as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it.
To put the problem in the simplest terms, the interests of the client continue to be sidelined in the way the firm operates and thinks about making money. Goldman Sachs is one of the world’s largest and most important investment banks and it is too integral to global finance to continue to act this way. The firm has veered so far from the place I joined right out of college that I can no longer in good conscience say that I identify with what it stands for.
It might sound surprising to a skeptical public, but culture was always a vital part of Goldman Sachs’s success. It revolved around teamwork, integrity, a spirit of humility, and always doing right by our clients. The culture was the secret sauce that made this place great and allowed us to earn our clients’ trust for 143 years. It wasn’t just about making money; this alone will not sustain a firm for so long. It had something to do with pride and belief in the organization. I am sad to say that I look around today and see virtually no trace of the culture that made me love working for this firm for many years. I no longer have the pride, or the belief.
But this was not always the case. For more than a decade I recruited and mentored candidates through our grueling interview process. I was selected as one of 10 people (out of a firm of more than 30,000) to appear on our recruiting video, which is played on every college campus we visit around the world. In 2006 I managed the summer intern program in sales and trading in New York for the 80 college students who made the cut, out of the thousands who applied.
I knew it was time to leave when I realized I could no longer look students in the eye and tell them what a great place this was to work.
When the history books are written about Goldman Sachs, they may reflect that the current chief executive officer, Lloyd C. Blankfein, and the president, Gary D. Cohn, lost hold of the firm’s culture on their watch. I truly believe that this decline in the firm’s moral fiber represents the single most serious threat to its long-run survival.
Over the course of my career I have had the privilege of advising two of the largest hedge funds on the planet, five of the largest asset managers in the United States, and three of the most prominent sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East and Asia. My clients have a total asset base of more than a trillion dollars. I have always taken a lot of pride in advising my clients to do what I believe is right for them, even if it means less money for the firm. This view is becoming increasingly unpopular at Goldman Sachs. Another sign that it was time to leave.
How did we get here? The firm changed the way it thought about leadership. Leadership used to be about ideas, setting an example and doing the right thing. Today, if you make enough money for the firm (and are not currently an ax murderer) you will be promoted into a position of influence.
What are three quick ways to become a leader? a) Execute on the firm’s “axes,” which is Goldman-speak for persuading your clients to invest in the stocks or other products that we are trying to get rid of because they are not seen as having a lot of potential profit. b) “Hunt Elephants.” In English: get your clients — some of whom are sophisticated, and some of whom aren’t — to trade whatever will bring the biggest profit to Goldman. Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t like selling my clients a product that is wrong for them. c) Find yourself sitting in a seat where your job is to trade any illiquid, opaque product with a three-letter acronym.
Today, many of these leaders display a Goldman Sachs culture quotient of exactly zero percent. I attend derivatives sales meetings where not one single minute is spent asking questions about how we can help clients. It’s purely about how we can make the most possible money off of them. If you were an alien from Mars and sat in on one of these meetings, you would believe that a client’s success or progress was not part of the thought process at all.
It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as “muppets,” sometimes over internal e-mail. Even after the S.E.C., Fabulous Fab, Abacus, God’s work, Carl Levin, Vampire Squids? No humility? I mean, come on. Integrity? It is eroding. I don’t know of any illegal behavior, but will people push the envelope and pitch lucrative and complicated products to clients even if they are not the simplest investments or the ones most directly aligned with the client’s goals? Absolutely. Every day, in fact.
It astounds me how little senior management gets a basic truth: If clients don’t trust you they will eventually stop doing business with you. It doesn’t matter how smart you are.
These days, the most common question I get from junior analysts about derivatives is, “How much money did we make off the client?” It bothers me every time I hear it, because it is a clear reflection of what they are observing from their leaders about the way they should behave. Now project 10 years into the future: You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that the junior analyst sitting quietly in the corner of the room hearing about “muppets,” “ripping eyeballs out” and “getting paid” doesn’t exactly turn into a model citizen.
When I was a first-year analyst I didn’t know where the bathroom was, or how to tie my shoelaces. I was taught to be concerned with learning the ropes, finding out what a derivative was, understanding finance, getting to know our clients and what motivated them, learning how they defined success and what we could do to help them get there.
My proudest moments in life — getting a full scholarship to go from South Africa to Stanford University, being selected as a Rhodes Scholar national finalist, winning a bronze medal for table tennis at the Maccabiah Games in Israel, known as the Jewish Olympics — have all come through hard work, with no shortcuts. Goldman Sachs today has become too much about shortcuts and not enough about achievement. It just doesn’t feel right to me anymore.
I hope this can be a wake-up call to the board of directors. Make the client the focal point of your business again. Without clients you will not make money. In fact, you will not exist. Weed out the morally bankrupt people, no matter how much money they make for the firm. And get the culture right again, so people want to work here for the right reasons. People who care only about making money will not sustain this firm — or the trust of its clients — for very much longer.

Greg Smith is resigning today as a Goldman Sachs executive director and head of the firm’s United States equity derivatives business in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

OBAMA & THE SHOREBANK CORRUPTION TIES - BAILOUT MONEY GOING TO HELP OBAMA FRIENDS

No more bailouts, no more greed, how many profits do you need?" That's been a signature chant of the community organizers and Big Labor thugs who have stormed bank offices and financial executives' private homes decrying corporate welfare over the past several months. But now that the federal government and a coalition of big banking interests are poised to bail out a crony Chicago bank with longtime ties to the Obama administration, Saul Alinsky's avenging angels are nowhere to be found.

ShoreBank is a Windy City investment bank with all the right (or, rather, left) ties. Its stated progressive mission isn't merely to make good lending decisions, but to engage in Barack Obama--esque social engineering to "create economic equity and a healthy environment." The ShoreBank corporate slogan: "Let's change the world."

The company website features a video of Obama in Kenya championing ShoreBank microlending projects overseas. ShoreBank has also touted itself as a "green" bank from its founding days — promoting dubious carbon-credit programs, subjecting new borrowers to eco-litmus tests ("we look at how you use water, how you recover water and clean it, how you use energy, if you produce clean energy, how you manage CO2, whether you are offsetting CO2 that your product produces, if you are using sustainably produced materials"), and encouraging customers to participate in "EcoDeposits" to "directly support the green agenda."

Social and environmental justice may make for good Volvo bumper stickers. They do not, however, make for a good bottom line. While the bank was on do-gooder missions around the world, business at home was in trouble. As the Wall Street Journal reported, "Losses racked up during the recession have left the bank facing a demand to raise new capital or face likely closure by regulators."

Enter the Chicago political friends and family of ShoreBank. The ties are long and deep, as the Central Illinois 9/12 Project has been chronicling for months:

ShoreBank co-founder Jan Piercy was a Wellesley College roommate of Hillary Clinton's, who has long supported the bank along with former president Bill Clinton.

Former ShoreBank vice chairman Bob Nash worked for Mrs. Clinton's presidential bid as deputy campaign manager. Board of directors member Howard Stanback is a Hyde Park neighborhood pal of President Obama, and served with Stanback on the board of the radical Woods Fund (where Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers also sat).
White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett served on the board of Chicago Metropolis 2020 with ShoreBank director Adele Simmons, former president of the liberal MacArthur Foundation, where she focused on "climate change" and "global governance" issues.

The bank and its employees donated some $12,000 to the Obama 2008 presidential campaign, and co-founder Mary Houghton reportedly gave advice to Obama's late mother about small-business lending issues